Difference between revisions of "Talk:Is the Phenomenology needed or recomended as introduction to Hegels System"
From Hegel Wiki
(Recommendation to change "foreword" to "Preface.") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think most English speakers know of the foreword to the Phenomenology as the "Preface." It's not unusual to find people referring to "Hegel's celebrated 'Preface' to the Phenomenology" as a stand alone unit. I recommend changing "foreword" in this article to "Preface" throughout. Both Baillie and Miller, the two best known English translators of the Phenomenology, refer to the "Preface" rather than the "foreword." | I think most English speakers know of the foreword to the Phenomenology as the "Preface." It's not unusual to find people referring to "Hegel's celebrated 'Preface' to the Phenomenology" as a stand alone unit. I recommend changing "foreword" in this article to "Preface" throughout. Both Baillie and Miller, the two best known English translators of the Phenomenology, refer to the "Preface" rather than the "foreword." | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Good point. I have changed the article according to your recomendation. I apreciate very much your help in making this article better readable for the native english speaker. [[User:Kai|Kai]] 15:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 23 April 2008
I think most English speakers know of the foreword to the Phenomenology as the "Preface." It's not unusual to find people referring to "Hegel's celebrated 'Preface' to the Phenomenology" as a stand alone unit. I recommend changing "foreword" in this article to "Preface" throughout. Both Baillie and Miller, the two best known English translators of the Phenomenology, refer to the "Preface" rather than the "foreword."
- Good point. I have changed the article according to your recomendation. I apreciate very much your help in making this article better readable for the native english speaker. Kai 15:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)